Shut to twenty years in the past, Vanguard got here out with the Complete World Index ETF (VT). Regardless of the plain attraction of such a fund, it did not get an amazing reception amongst devoted low-cost index mutual fund traders.
A part of that was as a result of it was an ETF—not a conventional mutual fund—and most of us again then, like Jack Bogle, considered these new-fangled ETFs as devices of economic destruction/hypothesis (the standard fund model of this fund did not present up till 2019).
A part of the issue was the truth that VT confirmed up in the summertime of 2008 and promptly misplaced half of its share value within the subsequent few months. That made the efficiency charts look sort of unhealthy for some time.
One other huge half was that you may construct VT from its parts, the Vanguard Complete Inventory Market Index Fund (VTI) and the Vanguard Complete Worldwide Inventory Market Index Fund (VXUS), at a lower cost than shopping for the already assembled model (VT). It wasn’t a dramatically lower cost, however it was a lower cost. Whereas that hole is smaller now, it nonetheless persists. VTI presently costs three foundation factors, VXUS eight, and VT 10.
Many individuals additionally felt it had an excessive amount of in worldwide inventory. Again then, nearly all of VT was non-US inventory. As US shares have largely outperformed during the last 15 years, that’s not the case. As I write this, VT is 62.9% US inventory, so it is much less of a difficulty. Nevertheless it’s nonetheless an excessive amount of for many individuals preferring a US tilt of their portfolio.
Because the years have gone on, the fund has been considerably redeemed. The worth has come down and ease has grow to be extra valued, and it eliminates the fixed fear about whether or not you’ve the correct quantity of worldwide shares since you personal the “market quantity.”
However I nonetheless do not put money into VT. Listed below are the the explanation why.
#1 We Do not Worth Portfolio Simplicity as Extremely as Many
Like goal retirement/lifecycle funds (a one-fund resolution), VT appeals primarily to those that extremely worth simplicity of their portfolio. They will get rid of an asset class from their portfolio. As a substitute of US shares and worldwide shares, they only personal shares. However we personally have already got 4 inventory asset courses, two bond asset courses, and three actual property asset courses in our portfolio. Clearly, maximal simplicity is not our major worth in portfolio design.
Extra data right here:
Finest Funding Portfolios — 150+ Portfolios Higher Than Yours
The 15 Questions You Must Reply to Construct Your Funding Portfolio
#2 We’re Cheapskates
The worth on VT has come down, however it nonetheless prices about 5 foundation factors greater than the part elements. Expense ratio variations of 5% actually do not matter that a lot, however for a bit of extra problem, I get options I need AND a lower cost. Why not take it?
#3 We’re Management Freaks
Our written investing plan would not name for us to personal shares on the planet capitalization-weighted prescription. It requires us to place two-thirds into US shares and one-third into worldwide shares. Fifteen years in the past, VT had too little US for our style. If the present US bull run continues, it would quickly have an excessive amount of. However both approach, we wish to management this, so we will through the use of the person funds.
#4 We Spend money on Taxable
US tax regulation says that mutual funds with lower than 50% of their property in overseas shares cannot distribute overseas tax credit to their traders. VT now has lower than 50% in overseas shares. By proudly owning the person funds, we nonetheless get the overseas tax credit score on our VXUS distributions, however VT house owners wouldn’t get a credit score in any respect.
Extra data right here:
From Broke to Multi-Deca-Millionaire — Classes Discovered from 42 Years of Investing
How Our Portfolio Carried out in 2025 (Together with Actual Property!)
#5 We Tax-Loss Harvest
Because the proponents of direct indexing have famous, the extra particular person securities you personal, the extra alternatives you’re more likely to need to tax-loss harvest. Two is certainly higher than one on this respect. To make issues worse, there is not an amazing tax-loss harvesting companion with which to swap VT. iShares gives URTH, however that does not embody rising market shares like VT. iShares additionally gives ACWI however at an expense ratio of 0.32%, and it has considerably much less rising markets publicity and far much less small cap publicity (solely 3,000 shares as an alternative of 10,000). Invesco’s PSRW is cheaper and it has extra EM, however it additionally has fewer shares and a fairly vital worth tilt.
There is perhaps a superb possibility on the market I have never discovered but, however it is not apparent like most tax-loss harvesting companions are.
#6 VT Is not Extensively Out there
This does not matter for us since each our US and worldwide shares at the moment are in taxable the place we will purchase something, however few 401(ok)s, 403(b)s, and 457(b)s provide VT. It simply is not common like VTI and VXUS. If you cannot get it, you may’t use it.
Extra data right here:
A Cheap Use for VT
So, when would somebody select to make use of VT? Effectively, my daughter did together with her first HSA contribution. It is all inventory, as a result of she desires to speculate aggressively. It is an ETF, so it is obtainable to commerce without spending a dime at Constancy, the place the HSA is housed. There is no want to take care of an advanced asset allocation because it’s only one ETF. It is a tax-protected account, so the lack of the power to tax-loss harvest and get a overseas tax credit score would not matter.
5 foundation factors on $8,300 = $4.15 this 12 months in extra expense ratio. Arduous to cry an excessive amount of about that. She will all the time change because the account grows with no tax penalties. Simplicity issues so much proper now, and VT could be very easy. Others may select to make use of it as they begin Roth IRAs for themselves or their kids.
VT is usually a quite simple fairness ETF resolution, however many people nonetheless aren’t going to wish to use it for the explanations outlined above.
What do you suppose? Do you utilize VT? Why or why not? Do you see completely different benefits or disadvantages of utilizing it?
